Dal Guardian del 22 aprile il òpunto su8lol’Expo di Shanghai, dove son o attesi 70o milion i di visitatori.
Shanghai 2010 Expo is set to be the world’s most expensive party
            
It is the biggest and most expensive party to which you have ever  been invited, and almost certainly the oddest – with buildings shaped  like rabbits and apples, Copenhagen’s Little Mermaid on show, and  violin-playing robots to serenade you.
You have probably never  heard of Shanghai‘s 2010 Expo and are still  less likely to attend. But from 1 May, the city will welcome an  estimated 70 million visitors to the $4bn (£2.6bn), six-month event, as  hyped in China as it is unknown outside it. Wen  Jiabao, the country’s premier, has described it as the fulfilment of a  100-year-old dream.
It has prompted a city-wide makeover that has  cost an estimated $45bn – more than Beijing’s pre-Olympics  transformation. In a matter of weeks the city has unveiled three subway  lines, a new airline terminal and a revamped waterfront. The facelift  for the latter, the historic Bund, alone cost $700m.
Even by  China’s frenetic pace of construction, the speed has been incredible –  Pan Haixiao, an urban planning expert at Tongji University, estimates  that without the event the changes would have taken three times as long.
An  army of workers is still racing to lay out pavements, plant mature  trees, roll out turf and install public art around the city. At the Expo  site itself, which spans 5.28 sq km on both banks of the Huangpu river –  covering the equivalent of almost 1,000 football pitches – hundreds  more toil to finish multimillion-pound pavilions.
Shanghai is  holding the biggest Expo ever as it attempts to resuscitate the  once-grand tradition of international gatherings that began with  London’s Great Exhibition in 1851, gave Paris the Eiffel Tower and drew  tens of millions of Americans to the landmark world’s fairs.
“They  were the entertainment event of the year wherever they took place,”  said Professor John Findling, author of the Encyclopedia of World’s  Fairs and Expos, who suggests they had the kind of impact the Olympics  do today. In their heyday, he points out, they were not competing with  television, theme parks or the internet.
“Visitors were anxious to  see people from exotic places, the latest in science, invention and  fine art, and to enjoy themselves … There was nothing else in the way of  amusement that was like it,” he said.
These days, few could  recall recent hosts – such as Aichi in Japan – and the events have less  razzmatazz and a more earnest tone. Their purpose “is to allow a global  dialogue on important issues facing the international community,” said  Vicente Gonzalez Loscertales, secretary general of the Bureau  International des Expositions – the world’s fair equivalent of the  International Olympic Committee.
But few outsiders believe that  the opportunity to discuss urbanisation – this year’s theme – is why 192  participating countries are laying out jaw-dropping sums. Instead, they  point to the thousands of companies hoping to cut lucrative deals and  find new customers.
“It’s the 21st century equivalent to the old  tribute to the emperor – we’ve all always had to pay to play in China,  but wind-up clocks and oompah bands are old hat so now we have to build  pavilions, sponsor things, cut cheques to official charities,” argued  Paul French of the Shanghai-based consultancy Access Asia.
For the  hosts there is at least as much at stake. Professor Anne-Marie Brady, a  political scientist at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch,  New Zealand, described the expo as a stimulus to Shanghai’s development  but also a “campaign of mass distraction”.
“The hoopla surrounding  it is aimed at helping Chinese people feel positive about their country  and how it is developing, distracting them from other, more depressing,  issues such as unemployment, the cost of living, official corruption  and incompetence, access to good healthcare [and] escalating house  prices,” she said. “In China today, the non-political is in fact deeply  political.”
There is certainly excitement among many residents.  Two hundred thousand people attended a trial run and even on cold,  drizzling weekdays inhabitants gather to peer through the 10-foot-high  wire fence towards the distant Chinese pavilion.
“We have waited  150 years for the chance to hold the expo in our country. Now we have  succeeded in two big events: the Olympics and this,” said 77-year-old  Wang Xinghua. “I feel even happier when people from other countries come  to visit – it represents China standing up in the world.”
The  mood at the site was not entirely harmonious. Moments after Wang  strolled away with his wife, stocky plain-clothed security officers  marched away a dozen vendors offering souvenir snaps. On Tuesday state  media reported that police had detained 6,000 people during their fourth  pre-expo crackdown in less than two months.
As officials step up  security, new restrictions range from banning kite-flying near the site –  and model aeroplanes across two provinces – to halting the sale of  knives at supermarkets.
And as before the Olympics, campaigners  warn of a crackdown on dissidents, activists and petitioners – including  some of the 18,000 households whose homes were bulldozed to make way  for the site. The Chinese Human Rights Defenders network says it has  documented six cases of people being sent for re-education through  labour for expo-related reasons this year alone, in addition to  detentions, questioning and harassment.
“The expo is nothing to do  with us. The big businesses earned most of the money, and corrupt  officials; money doesn’t get to us or the nation and they stop us  selling on the streets,” grumbled migrant toy-seller Huang, 60, who said  he could not afford to visit the expo. Although registered residents  have received free tickets, standard entry is 160 yuan – a hefty sum  when last year’s average urban disposable income was only 17,175 yuan.
Nearby,  Song Mi, 47, expected officials to clear away her sugarcane cart in  case it gave visitors a bad impression – and probably rightly, she  thought.
“I’m counting down the days until the expo opens. I want  to see everything,” she said. “It’s the biggest thing that’s happened in  my lifetime.”
Most expensive Saudi Arabia. With a  reported budget of $164m it includes imported date palms and a 1,600  square metre cinema screen – roughly a quarter the size of a football  pitch.
Most innovative Britain (pictured  below). Nicknamed the dandelion, it is pierced by 60,000 Perspex spines,  each containing a seed, which sway gently in the breeze.
Most  elegant Poland. The delicate, lacy exterior is inspired by  traditional paper-cutting; the interior will offer daily Chopin  recitals.
Most varied F
inland. It promises  a sauna for VIPs, occasional visits from Santa Claus and innovative  technology from Nokia.
Most imposing  China. At 63m tall, it is three times the height of other pavilions.  Though China is the first developing country to host an expo, the size  of the building underlines its status as a world power.
Most  symbolic Macau. The rabbit-shaped building, crouching in front  of the Chinese pavilion, is precisely 19.99 metres high – to represent  the date of its return from Portugal’s hands to China.
Most  futuristic Japan. The weirdly-shaped lilac “silkworm island”  uses holes and horns to control the temperature and boasts  violin-playing robots.
Most patriotic  North Korea. A large flag decorates the exterior and it contains a 4.5m  model of Pyongyang’s 170m Juche tower and it has video presentations  including Korean War footage.
Most dramatic  Canada. Organisers have collaborated with Cirque du Soleil and promise  exciting .

